![]()
- Next meeting: March 16, 2010, beginning at 6:30 pm in Vernal. Please RSVP for dinner to Lorien. We will be discussing the USFWS sage-grouse listing as well as plans for this year. For more information contact Lorien Belton (770-2413; lorien.belton@usu.edu)
- Chairs: Scott Chew and Dave Allison
Local Working Group (LWG) meetings are held quarterly. Unless otherwise noted the UBARM LWG meets during the following months:
January: in conjunction with UBPCD meeting (same day)
- Review plan strategies and actions
- Discuss spring monitoring and project goals
March: in conjunction with UBPCD meeting (same day)
- Updates and coordination regarding habitat or other project implementation and research projects.
Summer field tour in conjunction with Uintah Basin/Northeast Region PCD
November/December meeting: in conjunction with UBPCD meeting (same day)
- Discuss project updates
- Consider any new threats and any actions to take
- Propose new projects for funding in the upcoming year.
To be placed on the mailing list, or for specific meeting times and locations, contact Lorien Belton, CBCP Extension Specialist at 435-770-2413 or Lorien.belton@usu.edu.
UBARM Sage-grouse Conservation Plan
Reports and Publications
- Anthro Mountain Grazing Preliminary Project Report
- 2009 Preliminary Report on Lop and Scatter Project on Anthro Mountain
- 2008 Report on Prescribed Fire Research Activities
- 2008 Annual Report of USU Research Activities
- 2007 Annual Report of USU Research Activities
- 2006-7 Accomplishment Report; Uintah Basin section
- Master's Thesis by Leah Smith. 2009. Greater Sage-grouse and Energy Development in Northeastern Utah: Implications for Management
Minutes:
![]()
ECOLOGY OF A GREATER SAGE-GROUSE POPULATION INHABITING A NATURAL GAS FIELD IN
Currently, little information concerning the survival, reproductive success, or habitat use of this population is known. The Uintah Basin Local Working Group, the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, BLM, Anadarko Petroleum Inc, Enduring Resources LLC, the Ute Tribe, and others have partnered to collect this information and identify conservation measures that can be used to mitigate the effects of increased energy development on the Seep Ridge sage-grouse population. Additionally, we plan to compare sage-grouse avoidance of high traffic versus low traffic roads and will assess sage-grouse genetic diversity and divergence in northeastern Utah.
| Predated nest |
Biography
![]() |
Fire, Mountain Big Sagebrush, and Greater Sage-grouse
By Eric Thacker, Ph.D. Student, Wildland Resources
The role of fire in managing sagebrush ecosystems for sage-grouse has received increased scrutiny as populations decline. Wildfires have been cited as a major factor in these declines in more arid area of the species range because sagebrush and other native species are being replaced by invasive annual grasses. Additionally, because of the expansion of invasive species such as cheatgrass, the frequency and intensity of wildfires in sagebrush steppe ecosystems has increased (Baker 2006). This increase in fire return intervals has lead to a loss of habitat as sagebrush cover and desirable forb understories are replaced by invasive annuals.
The role of fire in sagebrush steppe system and sage-grouse management is spatially complex. There are several factors that make the response of fire in sagebrush steppe systems difficult to compare. Factors such as such sagebrush species, fuel loads, ecological condition prior to burning, ambient weather conditions, fire temperature, fire speed, and season of burn, all of which may lead to different outcomes. These factors then confound the comparisons of the effects of the fire. This makes it increasingly difficult to evaluate the use of prescribed burning for improvement of sage-grouse habitat.
The study included 10 plots, 5 plots were burned in the fall of 2007 leaving the remaining 5 unburned plots as treatment controls. The burns were conducted in the fall to achieve an objective of low intensity fires that would create mosaic patterns. The actual area burned consisted of less than 100 acres in a mosaic pattern. The vegetation monitoring began in the summer of 2006. Thus we have 2 seasons of pretreatment data which includes herbaceous cover, shrub canopy cover, shrub and herbaceous height and sage-grouse use. Sage-grouse use is measured using 3 methods: radio-telemetry, sage-grouse pellet densities, and birddog flush counts. All of these measures have been taken following the prescribed burns.
Biography
